Speaker of Parliament Advocates for Abolishing Ex-Gratia Payments

The Speaker of Parliament, Alban Sumana Kingsford Bagbin, has reaffirmed his position on the abolition of ex-gratia payments to Article 71 officeholders. Bagbin insists that these payments no longer serve their intended purpose of reducing corruption among public servants and political officeholders.

Speaking at a public forum in Kumasi to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the Fourth Republican Parliament, Bagbin explained that ex-gratia payments were originally designed to provide financial security for public servants and political officeholders after leaving office. This measure aimed to encourage them to prioritize public interests over personal gain, thereby curbing corruption.

However, Bagbin acknowledged that the intended purpose has not been achieved. He emphasized that the payments have not effectively addressed corruption as envisioned. Instead, the reality has deviated from the original goal, leading to a reassessment of their necessity.

Bagbin expressed his support for amending Article 71 of the Constitution to abolish ex-gratia payments. He clarified that the term “ex gratia” is often misunderstood and that the payments cover a broad category of public servants and political officeholders, not just members of parliament. This includes positions such as the Auditor General, chairpersons of constitutional commissions, ministers of state, the presidency, and the judiciary.

“The issue of ex-gratia is a very thorny issue. The founders envisaged a situation where they wanted some particular category of public servants, including political officeholders, to be assured that their needs would be taken care of after leaving office. This was meant to allow them to think about the people they represent without personal financial concerns. Unfortunately, in practice, it has not served its purpose. It has not been able to assist us in curbing or containing corruption.”

Bagbin concluded by reiterating his commitment to amending the constitution if elected as president. He supports the call to abolish Article 71, believing that it no longer serves its intended purpose and has become redundant. “It hasn’t served its purpose, there’s no use maintaining it,” he stated, aligning with others who advocate for its removal.